Disclaimer

This website http://www.maxipconsult.com (hereinafter referred to as the "website") is a public resource website and provides general information about the location of the firm MAXIPCONSULT LLC. Current Rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit lawyers to solicit work or advertise their services. The website is a resource website for non-commercial, general informational and educational purposes only and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from MAXIPCONSULT LLC, or any of its members, to solicit any work or create an Attorney-Client relationship through this website.

Although every effort is made to update this website and provide its visitors /users with accurate, updated and latest information, MAXIPCONSULT LLC does not guarantee or undertakes any warranties concerning the accuracy or completeness of the information provided on the website. Nothing on this website should be interpreted to constitute any legal advice. MAXIPCONSULT LLC is not liable for any consequences arising out of any action taken by the visitor / user relying on material/information provided on this website, and the visitor / user should seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the relevant country/state for any legal issue.

By proceeding further and clicking on the "I Agree" button herein below, the visitor /user acknowledges that he/she on his own accord wishes to know more about MAXIPCONSULT LLC and the website for his/her own information and use.

MaxiConsult LLC
img1
Trademark

Patent

Design Patent

Copyright

Domain Names

Custom Laws

    REGISTRAR'S INVOLVEMENT IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDIA

    It is interesting to note that the .IN Registry and the Registrars are not allowed to participate in the domain name dispute resolution proceedings in any capacity other than providing the information relevant to the registration and use of the domain name upon the request of the Arbitrator. The Registry and the Registrar are not liable for any decisions rendered by an Arbitrator.

    The remedies available to the complainant include the cancellation of the registrant's domain name or the transfer of domain name registration to the complainant. Costs, if deemed fit, may also be awarded by the Arbitrator.

    The registrant is prohibited from transferring the domain name registration to another holder in case arbitration proceeding is initiated for a period of fifteen working days after such proceeding is concluded or during a pending court proceeding or arbitration commenced regarding the domain name, unless the party to whom the domain name registration is being transferred agrees, in writing, to be bound by the decision of the court or arbitrator.

    The .INDRP though developed on the lines of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, differs significantly from the latter. While .INDRP deals only with domain names registered and used in the .in Internet Domain name, it is the generic top level domain name and some of the counties which have agreed to be governed by UDRP. The complainant has the authority to select the Provider who will then administer the proceedings like WIPO, NAF etc; the .IN Registry appoints the arbitrator for the same. The .INDRP does not deal with consolidation. Under the UDRP, however, where there are a multiple disputes between the Registrant and Complainant, either party may petition to consolidate the disputes before a single Administrative Panel.
Trademark
Enforcement & Remedies
Passing Off
How to register
What not to register
What to consider
Patent
Enforcement & Remedies
Ancilliary Work
Compulsory Licenses
How to register
What not to register
What to consider
Design Patent
Enforcement & Remedies
How to register
What to register
Copyright
Enforcement & Remedies
How to register
What to register
Domain Names
Enforcement & Remedies
How to register
What to consider
Custom Laws
Site designed and developed by DecizonSoft Infotech Pvt. Ltd.